Remediation over packaging also need to find out where "degree" is

[China Packaging Network News] Oversized and extravagant gift boxes, matching gold with jade—over-packaging is a clear example of wastefulness. It's time to address this issue through legal measures by strengthening regulations that limit both the quantity of goods and their packaging, while imposing stricter penalties on violators. However, the success of these laws depends on effective enforcement. Without real action from regulatory bodies, any legislation remains just words on paper.

The root cause of over-packaging lies in the production process. However, many products on the market today are imported, meaning local regulations cannot fully control the problem at its source. That’s why the "Provisions (Draft)" focuses on the sales stage, requiring sellers to clearly agree with suppliers that product packaging must meet mandatory standards and to inspect packaging upon receipt. By holding sellers accountable for checking packaging, they will be more motivated to comply with the law. Additionally, the draft includes provisions for public supervision, allowing citizens to report violations online. This creates an efficient system where consumers can expose excessive packaging through social media, making it easier for authorities to act quickly.

Despite these efforts, there are still concerns about the clarity and strictness of the standards. The draft states that the city will focus on key sectors and work with departments and industry associations to develop packaging guidelines. Currently, national standards only apply to food and cosmetics, which were introduced in 2010. These rules set limits such as no more than three layers of packaging, a void space of no more than 60%, and total external packaging costs not exceeding 20% of the product price. While these are steps in the right direction, they remain relatively lenient compared to international practices.

In countries like Japan, where packaging is highly regulated, laws state that the empty space inside a container should not exceed 20% of its volume, and packaging costs should not go beyond 15% of the product's selling price. Additionally, the product's value must be clearly labeled. The U.S. goes even further, considering excessive packaging that exceeds 10% of the product's volume or 30% of its cost as “commercial fraud,” which violates consumer rights.

Given these global examples, Shanghai needs to refine its current standards. It should not only expand the scope beyond food and cosmetics but also reduce allowable void spaces and lower the 60% threshold to a more reasonable level. This would help promote a more sustainable and resource-conscious society, aligning with international best practices and demonstrating a stronger commitment to environmental responsibility.